Is it possible to terraform the moon

Next Are some demographics better at driving? Related Content Physics. What is plasma? Physics Space. BepiColombo blasts off to Mercury. Video Podcasts. Your body in space. Engineering Physics Space. BepiColombo: The mission to Mercury. David Rothery: exploring Mercury. Your name. Leave this field blank. Support Us! Make a donation to support the Naked Scientists.

Forum discussions What are some low-tech ways to address climate change? Math ability and Culture QotW - BTW since gravity is the problem and it is a particle there aught to be SOME interaction that favorably produces gravitons…. Agree on the tunnel idea. The whole surface can be built with existing masses to a large honeycomb pattern of atmosphere and water oasis.

We would also need a super superconducting coil around the moon to protect us from energetic ions. The point is to build a city without having it be at ground zero of a comet impact to maintain the place. The majority of the city will be underground. The mining of resources will provide the building blocks for a robust lunar economy that will justify the costs of starting a project on this scope.

Oh yeah. I know its a long time until the earth becomes uninhabitable and even longer to the sun goes supernova. But assuming the human race lives that long, what does it take to survive the supernova?

We obviously need to move at least to the outer solar system, dig out a huge a bunker in the core of Pluto or something, but will the solar system remains be a livable place in proximity to a white dwarf? Will there be any water left? Do we need to travel all the way to another star and start terraforming there? If so, how far is it to the nearest new earth candidate?

What does it take to travel there? Obviously orders of magnitude more money and energy then the humans have had through all our history, by hey, we have a long time to save up, with compound interest.. IDK how you do that, even in sci-fi.

Orbital colonies are all around better. Existing 21st century tech would be even better. Not to mention gravity. Low gravity as found on the moon or Mars might not be conducive to health. I wonder if adding a monstrously thick ozone layer could compensate for the lack of a magnetic field.

Bo Zo: I agree totally, we should not be moving to other planets. Movable rotating space colonies make a lot more sense in my opinion, and we have the technology to do it.

Use the moon for resources to start building them. Protect them with thick hulls, magnetic fields, rotate them for 1g, give them the power to move. The power can come from the sun. Start in low earth orbit and work our way to the outer reaches of the solar system and beyond.

Make the colony movable so you can avoid incoming bigger objects, learn how to deflect the smaller ones. One advantage to the lower gravity moon is that we should finally be able to get our flying cars to work.

We should utilize the Lava tubes on the Moon seal them and pressurize them and build domes on some of the almost perfect craters it would look so cool from Earth with all the Moons lights turned on in the night sky….

The Moon is the next logical stop. Not Mars!!! Together with the space elevator and a revolving Space Station!!! We could probably build a space elevator on the moon with existing technology. Combine that with lava tube colonies, polar mining for ice, and domed crater cities, all tied together with a high speed monorail.

There are no proposals for a Space Elevator to the Moon. A space elevator reaches into geostationary orbit approx 35, km in altitude. Most assuredly not! We should learn to live with nature, not to dominate it!

The tides raised by the Earth on the Moon would be about 36 times higher than the ones raised by the Moon on the Earth. Crashing comets might do it, but we would have to steer comets towards the Moon and even if we managed to do that, a comet impact would be hard to control.

Terraform the moon? You so funny… mess with the gravitational equilibrium? BUT, if you want to talk terraforming.. THEN we could keep an atmosphere viable and long lived? But maybe a little volcanic activity would he helpful?

It would take a km diameter nitrogen rich 0. Photosynthesis would take about , years to make a breathable atmosphere and plants need to work six times harder to create the same partial pressure of oxygen as on Earth — better for a future with abundant power from fusion power or similar to split the molecules.

His Halley comets would hardly change its angular momentum at all. For those suggesting use of a magnetic field, it makes no difference. Happens over a time period of thousands of years. If the atmosphere is very thin the solar wind can strip it, happens on a timescale of days so very fast. A magnetic field could help at that point. But then, as your eyes adjust to the light, you start to piece together your surroundings. The moving blobs above you, you realize, are Some say life is a roller coaster.

What if it was more like this? We don't notice the earth spinning now, so what would life be like if it spun a little faster? Would we What if the Moon suddenly began getting closer to Earth? To the point where it was on a collision course with our planet? Would the Earth survive the crash? Humans have explored the Moon, Mars, and of course, Earth.

But what do we know about Jupiter? For the most part, this gas giant is a mystery. So what would happen if you Related videos. Add comment. Obviously, we can't just pack our stuff and move there today. But what if we terraformed it - reshaped it into an Earth's image? You may also like.

Our lungs might be fine in that short a time frame, but the rest of the planet? Not so much. Connect with.